*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Marcion was critical in the emergence of the Catholic Church. Harnack presents Marcion’s historical significance. Adolf Harnack () was a German theologian, scholar and historian. on Marcion called Marcion, das Evangelium vom fremden Gott (Marcion and the . The outlines of Harnack’s landmark monograph on Marcion are well known from summaries and discussions of it as well as through the German original. But it is.

Author: Naktilar Zubei
Country: Guinea-Bissau
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 2 August 2009
Pages: 303
PDF File Size: 8.87 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.50 Mb
ISBN: 957-6-83093-159-4
Downloads: 89513
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulubar

Alex Moma marked it as to-read Aug 31, In the case of Paul, it was the pharisaic treatment of the law, and the deliverance was righteousness by faith. Marcion’s message was so successful that the early Catholic Church’s All-Stars were still writing refutations of Marcionism hundreds of years later, and ended up adopting many of his innovations, the most notable of which being his idea of an official canon of holy literature.

And think of the Johannine retrojection of the quarrels and excommunications of his own day into the story of Jesus, as Louis Martyn has demonstrated History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel.

Harnack on Marcion | Peter Leithart

Harnack notes the similarity between Marcion’s repudiation of the writing Prophets and the neglect of the same figures in the Qur’an on this see also Tor Andrae’s Muahammad: Should Jews take exception to such a posture? The idea of a deliverance of all men, which seems to follow from his doctrine of boundless grace, was quite foreign to him. Tertullian sometimes seemed to admit as much.

For this reason his reconstruction of the Marcionite bible was partly based on the view that Marcion removed from the documents many statements that contradicted Marcionite beliefs. I haenack think I’d read it again but I’ll keep it for reference. Reviewed by Robert M. Do we want to say it?

Harnack on Marcion

Markus Dialogue II, 5: Kalina Bahchevanova marked it as to-read Sep 11, Just now scholars are rethinking their theories on the origins of Gnosticism, whether it evolved from within Judaism or from Christianity, how much Platonic or Iranian influence there might have been. Hahn Regimonti, has attempted to restore the Antitheses. He was the first who laid marcioh firm foundation for establishing what is Christian, because, in view of the absoluteness of his faith, 38 he had no desire to appeal either to hagnack secret evangelic tradition, or to prophecy, or to natural religion.

Harnack traced the influence of Hellenistic philosophy on early Christian writing and called on Christians to question the authenticity of doctrines that arose in the Carl Gustav Adolf von Harnack 7 May — 10 June was a German Lutheran theologian and prominent church historian. He was no moralist, no Greek mystic, no Garnack enthusiast, but a religious character, nay, one of the few pronouncedly typical religious characters whom we know in the early Church before Augustine.


The antinomianism of Marcion was ultimately based on the strength of mqrcion religious feeling, on his personal religion as contrasted with all statutory religion That was also its basis in the case of the prophets and of Paul, only the statutory religion which was felt to be a burden and a fetter was different in each case.

Consequently, Marcion gives important testimony against the historical reliability of the notion that the common Christianity was really based on the tradition of the twelve Apostles.

The contradiction in which Marcion is here involved is evident, because he taught expressly that the spirit of man is in itself just as foreign to the good God as his body.

When more than years later the same question emerged for the first time in scientific form, its solution had likewise to be first attempted from the Pauline Epistles, and therefore led at the outset to a one-sidedness similar to that of Marcion.

Harnack’s Marcion: Galatians » Peter Kirby

But in this case the god of creation also disappeared, and the fact that Marcion could make this sacrifice proves that this religious spirit, with all his energy, was not able to rise to the height of the religious faith which we find in the preaching of Jesus. In this conviction he founded a Church: Here is a frank recognition that there is no meaningful “Judeo-Christian Tradition,” that to maintain that there is, is a veiled attempt to co-opt the older religion in the interests of the younger.

The numerous contradictions which arise as soon as one attempts to reduce Marcion’s propositions to a system, and the fact that his disciples tried all possible conceptions of the doctrine of principles, and defined the relation of the two Gods very differently, are the clearest proof that Marcion was a religious character, that he had in general nothing to do with principles, but with living beings whose power he felt, and that what he ultimately saw in the Gospel was not an explanation of the world, but redemption from the world, 10 –redemption from a world, which even in the best that it can offer, has nothing that can reach the height of the blessing bestowed in Christ.

Thanks for telling us about the problem.

The departure for the Apostolic Council: Refresh and try again. The consciousness of this moved him to a historical criticism of the whole Christian tradition.

Nearly all ecclesiastical writers, from Justin to Origen, opposed Marcion. Markus Dialogue II, 19 twice: All anti-heretical writings hxrnack the early Church, but especially Justin, Apol.

He rather clung to the publicity of the preaching, and endeavoured to reform Christendom, in opposition to the attempts at founding schools for those who knew and mystery cults for such as were in quest of initiation.

Online resources by Harnack: It was only after the failure of his attempts at reform that he founded churches of his own, in which brotherly equality, freedom from all ceremonies, and strict hrnack discipline were to rule. To ask other readers questions about Marcionplease sign up.

  C152 POH PDF

Marcion was the first, and for a long time the only Gentile Christian who took his stand on Paul. Donnie Jefferson marked it as to-read Sep 06, Even with the regret table omission of the extensive appendices of the original, the book still offers a feast. As the law which governs the world is harnakc, and yet, on the other hand, full of contradictions, just and again brutal, and as the law of the Old Testament haenack the same features, so the god of creation was to Marcion a being who united in himself the whole gradations of attributes from justice to malevolence, from obstinacy to inconsistency.

And yet this innovation was partly caused by a religious conviction, the origin of which must be sought not in heathenism, but on Old Testament and Christian soil. T he outlines of Harnack’s landmark monograph on Marcion are well known from summaries and discussions of it as well as through the German original. But it is an event worthy of note for the work to appear in English, where the complexities and nuances of Harnack’s presentation are now opened up to a wider readership.

These are outwardly better than those who refuse him obedience.

Gospel of Marcion

If we think of the lofty demands he made on Christians, and, on the other hand, ponder the results that accompanied his activity, we cannot fail to wonder. Marcion, an extract from the History of Dogma Part 1 Part 2 The English translation of Marcion and the Gospel of the Alien God is still under copyright, however the German text which includes Harnack’s reconstruction of the Marcionite Bible has risen into the public domain, and is avalible at Archive.

Books by Adolf von Harnack. The theoretic contradictions are explained by the different interests which here cross each other in Marcion.

Peder Roulund marked it as to-read Mar 25, Its reconstructed fragments now appear among the New Testament apocrypha. This view, marciom involved the principle of a metaphysical dualism, had something very specious about it, and to its influence we must probably ascribe the fact that Marcion no longer attempted to derive the creator of the world from the good God. He couldn’t countenance the God of the Old Testament, and he couldn’t bear the Jewishness of the new faith.

Marcion had no interest in specially emphasizing the distinction between the good God and Christ, which according to the Pauline Epistles, could not marfion denied.