ANALISIS INSTITUCIONAL LOURAU PDF
Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Country:||Trinidad & Tobago|
|Published (Last):||13 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||8.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In the face of the heterogeneity that characterizes the institutional work, the field diary carries out a relationship that has as a horizon the horizontality, the self-management.
With tears in her eyes, a children’s teacher reads in her field diary the scene that destabilized her: Not that the will to domination is exhausted by working under the logic of the event, but it breaks the chains of a fact that is always objective, external, alien to the will of the people: These are regularities that escape the evolutionist perspective, articulating “the discontinuity of regularities, the chance of their transformations, the materiality of their conditions of existence” instihucional.
Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or anxlisis, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance.
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective. When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, it is difficult for analjsis who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate institucionall is built up in the collective may suggest that the performance in the presented event could have been in many other ways.
Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of denaturalization of institutions. For this reason, Lourau affirms that the field diary in a socioanalytic intervention is not an intimate exercise, but a collective movement – less by the fingers that write the text and more by the ideas that compose it.
They enter into the game of thinking the people, with their affections and knowledge, not to deny what was done, but to denature it by overflowing unprecedented limits. The author as a protagonist The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial.
These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary.
ANÁLISIS INSTITUCIONAL by Maritza Valdez on Prezi
Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation. The fact precedes the action and perception instituciinal the individual. Thus, when intervening in the tutelary council it is necessary to think of it as an institution that has a history and movements that escape the boundaries of the place and the space-time condition of the establishment.
The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.
What sustains a record of the social fact is its objectivity.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
The diary carries a certain hardness of thinking and problematizing what we do, because it confronts a meritocratic formation based on the error-correctness present in the pedagogical processes sedimented by the academic and professional formation that since the nineteenth century constitutes us. The urgent character that characterizes the work of many establishments, given by rushed routines and the lack of conditions for more careful procedures, contrasts with the practice of thinking provoked by the writing of the field diary.
Thereby, to institutionalize is to compose discipline, to affirm essences. That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p.
Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Even an act conducted personally is crossed by norms, affections, conditions, circumstances that take the professional practice off the heroic scene. No models to follow? In the tutelary council it is usual to take as true the version that presents itself in the first moment. The volatility of chance frightens those who intend, with their knowledge or in the process of building their knowledge, to have certainty that the paths are rebuilt with the acuity of a researcher who will know how to read the clues.
From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted.
For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory. Compulsory schooling, the ways in which relationships are established in this family, the imposition by the school of family tasks as a condition for the performance of pedagogical activities Analyzing our implications is a way of thinking of ourselves as the producers of relationships, in opposition to the movement that understands them as data from which we have to adjust.
The universal collapses and judgments give way to other ways of working. Unlike the concept of “social fact” proposed by Durkheim, who grounds the positivist method, the field diary proposed by institutional analysis and in the light of Michel Foucault’s concept of event does not attribute any value to any episode, act and situation.
A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare. It should be said: The analysis can only be creative if it is free to circulate between possibilities not perceived or not summoned in the act of registration.
Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements. An important tool for carrying out the implication analysis is the field diary, which operates as a narrative of day-to-day intervention, historicizing it, rescuing it, potentializing it, in instituciknal words, enabling analysis by the act of writing.
For the latter, every act-fact is always reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis. The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other ahalisis. Education without a previous shape?
Next, the mother comes to the board demanding the child back. Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: The author as a protagonist.
What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth.